View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Why was the Sijun outlook changed?" |
Mikko K member
Member # Joined: 29 Apr 2003 Posts: 639
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:26 am |
|
 |
Am I the only one who thinks the old one was way more pleasing to look at?
When viewing dark images this bright background is very annoying  |
|
Back to top |
|
spyroteknik member
Member # Joined: 29 Apr 2003 Posts: 376 Location: north east uk
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:32 am |
|
 |
i'm guessing the board was upgraded due to the exploit that allowed stacy to make himself moderator, skin hasn't been replaced yet, i'm hoping that's the case |
|
Back to top |
|
Mikko K member
Member # Joined: 29 Apr 2003 Posts: 639
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:35 am |
|
 |
This looks so default that you're hopefully right  |
|
Back to top |
|
The Real Mark member
Member # Joined: 13 Dec 2003 Posts: 322 Location: Brisbane Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:47 am |
|
 |
I come in and i'm like - hmm must have click on the wrong forum... wait nope, this is sijun, hmm feels new yet I see this style all the time. As soon as the I saw the new style I could smell a great big wiff of bush fire near my house... someone must be burning off  |
|
Back to top |
|
Godwin member
Member # Joined: 24 Apr 2002 Posts: 701 Location: Singapore
|
|
Back to top |
|
gLitterbug member
Member # Joined: 13 Feb 2001 Posts: 1340 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 7:52 am |
|
 |
I very much hope this will be resolved soon, because this light default skin is torture on my eyes. |
|
Back to top |
|
oDD member
Member # Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 1000 Location: Wroclaw Poland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:35 am |
|
 |
newest version of phpbb 2.0.13
sijun version 2.0.3
there were no updates. _________________ portfolio | art blog |
|
Back to top |
|
Chris member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 746 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:12 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
newest version of phpbb 2.0.13
sijun version 2.0.3
|
maybe my numbering system is off...
but isn't 2.0.3 newer then the newest version you have of 2.0.13?  _________________ My signature is irrelevant |
|
Back to top |
|
Cpt.Obvious member
Member # Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:21 am |
|
 |
change it back please  |
|
Back to top |
|
see member
Member # Joined: 04 Aug 2001 Posts: 481 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 9:55 am |
|
 |
nO way ... i want the black background back  |
|
Back to top |
|
Lunchtimemama junior member
Member # Joined: 10 Sep 2004 Posts: 10 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:08 am |
|
 |
Hmm... back to normal it would seem. |
|
Back to top |
|
Chris member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 746 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:21 am |
|
 |
never seen so many cry babies before
like he was going to keep it like that...
patience is virtue _________________ My signature is irrelevant |
|
Back to top |
|
Matthew member
Member # Joined: 05 Oct 2002 Posts: 3784 Location: I am out of here for good
|
Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2005 10:24 am |
|
 |
Maybe Dhab is making some changes.
Arno will be looking into an update soon he said due to the recent
vulnerabilities in PHPbb, that's all I know for now.
Edit, he made the update, look here:
http://forums.sijun.com/viewtopic.php?t=38952
Matthew |
|
Back to top |
|
oDD member
Member # Joined: 07 May 2002 Posts: 1000 Location: Wroclaw Poland
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:04 am |
|
 |
Chris wrote: |
Quote: |
newest version of phpbb 2.0.13
sijun version 2.0.3
|
maybe my numbering system is off...
but isn't 2.0.3 newer then the newest version you have of 2.0.13?  |
NO. according to YOUR numbering system they degraded the board... youve made wrong assumptions about how to read the version number. _________________ portfolio | art blog |
|
Back to top |
|
Chris member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 746 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 11:33 am |
|
 |
I guess I did, my apologies
just doesn't look right to me for some reason though
btw, what happen to .12? phantom version lol _________________ My signature is irrelevant |
|
Back to top |
|
|