View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Render, Rendering, look here" |
chrisk82 member
Member # Joined: 16 Jan 2000 Posts: 91 Location: CO
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 7:48 pm |
|
 |
Everyone keeps saying people need to render this and render that on 2d pictures. You cannot render anything on a 2d picture. Rendering only applies to 3d work formed in 3d programs such as Maya, Ray Dream, and others. So, I hope this helps all of you out. This has really been bugging me, I get bugged very easy  |
|
Back to top |
|
Jerrid member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 66 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 8:05 pm |
|
 |
Accually, you are completely wrong. I don't even know why you would post something so stupid, because everyone else on this board knows you are wrong also.
Here is the definition from my 1999 Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
render: to reproduce or represent by artistic or verbal means.
Now, if you don't know what it means when somebody says "you need to render the picture a bit more", may god help you. Go and pick up some books and read, and I sure hope you are an amatuer.
Think before you post next time, and maybe even research.
------------------
Jerrid
|
|
Back to top |
|
DuKEZ member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 1999 Posts: 317 Location: BayArea
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 8:46 pm |
|
 |
the word render has alot of meanings..
If your coloring a b/w 2d image your rendering (reproducing) it..
same as a 3d image. from wireframe rendered (reproduced) to textures, colors and lighting
|
|
Back to top |
|
Trance-R member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 1999 Posts: 360 Location: Burnaby, BC, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 8:48 pm |
|
 |
2D rendering means to shade add highlights, textures... whatever. Not neccessarily 3D. When there was no such thing as 3D. We would refer to retouching and adding details blah blah blah as rendering. So... who cares!!! =D
It's just R-E-N-D-E-R |
|
Back to top |
|
cecil member
Member # Joined: 16 Nov 1999 Posts: 151
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 8:59 pm |
|
 |
I chopped off his hands with an axe, rendering him defenseless... |
|
Back to top |
|
imdaking member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 321 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 1999 10:03 pm |
|
 |
hey jerrid...
what is your problem man?
don't be such an asshole on christmas !
JEEEEEEZ! |
|
Back to top |
|
Oscar Alexander member
Member # Joined: 21 Dec 1999 Posts: 295 Location: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 1999 3:09 am |
|
 |
"Stupid is as stupid does" --Forrest Gump  |
|
Back to top |
|
Muzman member
Member # Joined: 12 Jan 2000 Posts: 675 Location: Western Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 1999 10:09 am |
|
 |
It's also that plaster they use to cover brick work
A lot of folk do think that computer talk is the origin of words. But it's the other way around.
the origins of 3d graphics come from the maths of technical drawing and drafting (to a degree). Is it any wonder that when lighting & shading a scene in the computer they use the same term as graphic artists.
I'm sure most here know this stuff well; like burning and dodgeing being photolab techniques, layers and masks being graphic design production tricks etc etc.
but it's still amazing how folk miss this stuff a lot of the time |
|
Back to top |
|
chrisk82 member
Member # Joined: 16 Jan 2000 Posts: 91 Location: CO
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 1999 8:22 pm |
|
 |
Okay, maybe I was a bit off. I never heard rendering refered to 2d work. Sometimes I do jump to conclusions.
I edited this post from some nasty stuff. you don't want to see it.
[This message has been edited by Chrisk82 (edited December 25, 1999).] |
|
Back to top |
|
Jerrid member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 66 Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 1999 8:26 pm |
|
 |
LOL!! I don't see how you can blame any of this on us at ALL. You are the one that posted the damn message to begin with.
Grow up.
------------------
Jerrid
|
|
Back to top |
|
chrisk82 member
Member # Joined: 16 Jan 2000 Posts: 91 Location: CO
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 1999 8:30 pm |
|
 |
I see Jerrid caught the original post. |
|
Back to top |
|
Muzman member
Member # Joined: 12 Jan 2000 Posts: 675 Location: Western Australia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 8:42 am |
|
 |
hehe
c'mon, clue us in
don't hold back! |
|
Back to top |
|
Shrimpish Guest
Member #
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 1999 3:19 am |
|
 |
Dudez, Crisk was referring to "render" as the menu option in all 3d programs. (if you know anything about 3d), as PhotoShop, or any 2d program for that matter, doesn't have one. In PS, you just take brush strokes all the way to the end of your piece. In 3d, you put together all the objects, the light values, the textures, camera view, and click "render." (Which may sometime take a godawful overnight if your system doesn't have a 3d card. Yuck!)
Sooo... Don't call the boy stupid, mmmkay?? |
|
Back to top |
|
Oscar Alexander member
Member # Joined: 21 Dec 1999 Posts: 295 Location: Amersfoort, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 1999 3:35 am |
|
 |
I don't think any of us want to go over this again, but Chrisk stated:
"You cannot render anything on a 2d picture. Rendering only applies to 3d work formed in 3d programs..."
Perhaps this may not sound stupid to you, but I think it's pretty ignorant...
Anyway, I hope Chrisk now knows the correct definition of "rendering"
As for you Shrimpish, open Photoshop, click the "Filter" pulldown and behold!! A RENDER option!
[This message has been edited by Oscar Alexander (edited December 27, 1999).] |
|
Back to top |
|
Mongoose member
Member # Joined: 22 Oct 1999 Posts: 363 Location: North
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 1999 5:59 am |
|
 |
hahha Oscar! Good call
Also, 3dcards have NOTHING to do with render times in 3D. It's based on pure CPU/RAM power. |
|
Back to top |
|
chrisk82 member
Member # Joined: 16 Jan 2000 Posts: 91 Location: CO
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 1999 8:37 am |
|
 |
Excuse me, but I thought rendering was only applied to a picture when the computer took over to draw something. I didn't think 'rendering' was something that came from a human. I just thought about this so my first post isn't really what I was thinking. Also, I wasn't thinking about using rendering in talk - like Jerrid posted out, I believe.
Sorry for not every god damn thing in the world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|