View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Two photomanips and a "painting-manip"" |
Justin Kramer member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 2000 Posts: 143 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2001 9:17 am |
|
 |
What do you guys think of these two photomanips? Specifically I'm wondering whether they have enough of a focus, or subject, to hold them together. Are they just "pretty textures"?
And... a "painting-manip" -- i.e., a painting used as the base, not a photo (I thought the painting sucked, so I obscured it with textures, etc). Opinions/crits on this one welcome too.
[ July 18, 2001: Message edited by: Justin Kramer ] |
|
Back to top |
|
sCriBBler aka Jito member
Member # Joined: 13 Jul 2001 Posts: 74 Location: france
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2001 9:47 am |
|
 |
it's kewl the second one makes me think
of this operation: a slide +salt water+time
and the third will be better for my taste more darker  |
|
Back to top |
|
Justin Kramer member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 2000 Posts: 143 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2001 4:13 pm |
|
 |
scribbler: no idea what your first comment meant, but I'll take it as a compliment
As for the third piece being too light, that was partly intentional: I want it to play subtle tricks on the eye. Maybe it didn't work too well, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
Justin Kramer member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 2000 Posts: 143 Location: Ithaca, NY
|
Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2001 4:51 pm |
|
 |
I feel guilty doing this, but...*bump*
if there are no more comments, I'll take it that this direction is a dead end  |
|
Back to top |
|
|