View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Jpeg compression and image posting... What quality is good?" |
FallDamage member
Member # Joined: 03 Nov 2003 Posts: 474 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:24 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
I'm just wondering in terms of posting sketch images like this on forums where I want the size to be enough so that the detail work and such is apparent, but at the same time, I don't want the image to be too huge. At what size would the quality of this sort of thing start to degrade?
http://forums.sijun.com/viewtopic.php?t=41678
The above was saved from psd to jpeg at image quality level 9. Back int he day I used to do everything at quality level 12 thinking that anything less would harm the image(the people over at CA started moaning about their modems...). Is there some sort of calculation or science to it, or is it just a matter of visual trial and error?
Last edited by FallDamage on Sat Oct 13, 2007 3:00 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
Ranath member
Member # Joined: 02 Apr 2004 Posts: 611 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:39 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
8-9 should be enough. Look at you gradients and sharp edges. If there's jpg artifacting, you have to go higher.. but with 8-9 they should be good. |
|
Back to top |
|
notic member
Member # Joined: 09 Apr 2001 Posts: 441 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:51 am |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
i would say 8 as well, works best for me
cool pic btw! |
|
Back to top |
|
Mikko K member
Member # Joined: 29 Apr 2003 Posts: 639
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:02 pm |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
50 percent in Save for Web is often enough for my taste.
I remember Dusso actually added .jpg artifacts to his images to get rid of the artificial planes of flat color.
IMO, it's laughable how much people are concerned about .jpg artifacts. I wish that was the biggest issue with my stuff, hehe! |
|
Back to top |
|
eyewoo member
Member # Joined: 23 Jun 2001 Posts: 2662 Location: Carbondale, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
neff member
Member # Joined: 11 May 2002 Posts: 1444 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:58 pm |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
i take 70%. I'm PRO! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/105ce/105cec91ea13b93b6ee45ee709d4bbff66ec0a1c" alt="Laughing" _________________ *
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b59a/3b59aa4ccc28b26c378f423695690511997a09d4" alt="" |
|
Back to top |
|
Max member
Member # Joined: 12 Aug 2002 Posts: 3210 Location: MIND
|
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 3:01 pm |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c9a/f8c9abba30dfa9d2fe76d79a383ea2f0ffedcdd4" alt="" |
About 8 should do it. I try to be under 200kb. Always depands on the pic, colors values etc of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
|