 |
|
 |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Topic : "Thomas Kinkade" |
Intuos member
Member # Joined: 29 Oct 2000 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 9:41 pm |
|
 |
Thomas Kinkade, I suppose, has become somewhat "trendy", but I've always loved his work. I was wondering if there are any other "fans" of his paintings here?
I think I remember a VERY long time ago Craig mentioning that he roomed with him in College, or something like that? Anyway, I absolutely love the way he uses light in his works. It's so... harmonic.
Hmm, while I'm on this topic, would anyone know of a webpage that has some high-resolution scans of his stuff?
Thomas Kinkade |
|
Back to top |
|
jr member
Member # Joined: 17 Jun 2001 Posts: 1046 Location: nyc
|
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 9:54 pm |
|
 |
ah yes, the christian painter of light. a great marketer and pretty good painter too. i'm pretty sure he's much older than craig, you're talking about mr. spooge right? _________________  |
|
Back to top |
|
Intuos member
Member # Joined: 29 Oct 2000 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 10:00 pm |
|
 |
Heh, yea, I don't agree with his religion, but I do love his work.
Yea, I'm talkin' about Spooge. Kinkade is only 44, I think that is approximately Craig's age, isn't it? |
|
Back to top |
|
balistic member
Member # Joined: 01 Jun 2000 Posts: 2599 Location: Reno, NV, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:54 am |
|
 |
"The Painter of Light"
He doesn't even understand light. At least, not in any painting of his that I've seen.
It's wallpaper. He's a decorator, not a painter.
Bob Ross has infinitely more credibility to me than Kinkade does.
At least Bob Ross didn't produce his paintings in a factory and sell them to little old ladies for ridiculous amounts of money. I mean, shit, an unframed 16x20" print (onto which an assistant has painted highlights) is $700. The day it goes up in value is the day the aliens invade and replace our brains with Tic-Tacs.
And it looks horrid. Cripes it's bad.
There are at least 30 people on Sijun who out-paint Kinkade.
If you're into romantic landscapes, look into Moran:
http://www.ellensplace.net/moran.html
or Parrish:
http://parrish.artpassions.net/parrish.html
They deal a slightly idealized reality, similar to Kinkade, but they are much better painters. Parrish uses colors like a sensory bazooka. _________________ brian.prince|light.comp.paint |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 11:18 am |
|
 |
Yo Ballistic - I agree with you 100% - his work is decorative; it seems as if his lighting is too localized within areas of the piece without proper dispersment.
But some people enjoy it and will buy it.
By the way, Parrish is the shiznit. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
Anthony member
Member # Joined: 13 Apr 2000 Posts: 1577 Location: Winter Park, FLA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 11:18 am |
|
 |
I find his work pretty. That's about all I ask of artists who are trying...to make something pretty. _________________ -Anthony
Carpe Carpem
http://www.anthonyfransella.com |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 11:19 am |
|
 |
Anthony - I can relate to that as well - it is pretty stuff, and as I said before some people will gladly buy it. I for one prefer other stuff. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
NeoFun member
Member # Joined: 12 Oct 2000 Posts: 263 Location: California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 11:22 am |
|
 |
Either he is an actual "painter of light" or is simply capitalizing off of religion. Either way, he lacks talent and needs some help on how to draw the human form. _________________ i like rice. |
|
Back to top |
|
ZippZopp member
Member # Joined: 09 Jan 2002 Posts: 229 Location: CT
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 11:58 am |
|
 |
while his paintings seem somewhat cheesy to me, i wouldn't say he lacks skill, his work is pretty tightly rendered which does take skill. i've seen much better painters and would agree that there are quite a few people in this community who are better, but i will give him some credit |
|
Back to top |
|
Intuos member
Member # Joined: 29 Oct 2000 Posts: 182
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 3:01 pm |
|
 |
NeoFun wrote: |
Either he is an actual "painter of light" or is simply capitalizing off of religion. Either way, he lacks talent and needs some help on how to draw the human form. |
Err.. I really don't want to be rude, but do you really think YOU are qualified to make that statement? I mean, he lacks talent and needs help on how to draw the human form? Don't you feel that might be pushing it a little? I mean, you have seen your own stuff, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
balistic member
Member # Joined: 01 Jun 2000 Posts: 2599 Location: Reno, NV, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 4:48 pm |
|
 |
Speaking of painting light, I stumbled across this on a Maxfield Parrish site:
I hadn't seen it before. My respect swells. Awesome. Need to find a better photo of it though . . . _________________ brian.prince|light.comp.paint |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:10 pm |
|
 |
I wouldn't say that Kinkade lacks talent. I think he does have artistic ability; however, I personally don't like his style (I find it a bit over sensational and canned), but I don't think he is trying to appeal to the me or any other member of the artistic community - he's marketing himself to a broad consumer audience - Grannies and Moms and folks like that, and he's done a pretty good job at it. In that respect I do give him some credit; he's doing what he wants to do and making a living at it; people are buying his stuff.
Being able to successfully market yourself as an artist is in itself an accomplishment, and it's what we all strive for - as creatives - in some way or another. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
igorknez junior member
Member # Joined: 27 Apr 2001 Posts: 2 Location: Santa Monica
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:03 pm |
|
 |
I can't believe Kinkade is discussed here on Sijun Art forum.
Come on people... there are MANY artists that deserve attention and they don't get any!
Come on .... that guy creates probably the worst works on this planet.
The fact that he has some technical talent just makes things worse.
Him and his buddy Wyland just make me puke.
How many more stupid warmly lit houses in fantasy-fairy suburban setting should we see as we walk down any main street in any major town in the US?
Xmas Fusion Galore (TM) for all of us fooooreeeeeveeeerrrrrr. _________________ youmayfindyourself |
|
Back to top |
|
don perkins junior member
Member # Joined: 23 Jul 2001 Posts: 40 Location: Wilmington, N.C.
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 6:25 pm |
|
 |
kinkaid (sp?)...what a hack. And yes, I know my work sucks, but at least i don't paint sucrose. It does irritate me though that he paints anything and it sells, and there are very talented artists with vision, having to work menial jobs to pay the rent. It's true in any art form though; listen to the 'popular' stuff on the radio...
Thanks for the great links Brian; Parrish has always been a favorite, as well as Moran. _________________ Don Perkins
www.donperkins.com |
|
Back to top |
|
YVerloc member
Member # Joined: 07 Jun 2002 Posts: 84 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 6:44 pm |
|
 |
I believe it was Samuel Johnson who said of Alexander Pope's "Essay on Man" that "Never before has paucity of knowledge and vulgarity of sentiment been so happily diguised". That sums up my feelings about Kinkade's work excellently.
A friend of mine recently attended a lecture on the subject of pornograhy. The lecturer presented an interesting analogy in suggesting that romance novels are the de-facto female analogue of the porn film industry. If that's the case, then I put it to you that a Kinkade painting is the heartland housewife's 'Beer Girl' poster. Or to borrow from Chomsky: "one person's pin-up nudie is a another person's pink landscape"
Anyhow, opinions are one's own to hold, and that's mine for what it's worth.
YV |
|
Back to top |
|
tayete member
Member # Joined: 03 Dec 2000 Posts: 656 Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2002 12:23 am |
|
 |
Well, I didn't know this guy's work, but I must say it reminds me of those cheesy Christmas cards that are sold at the street.
I am not a good artist, but I can distinguish what has "quality" and what not. And that pictures definitely lack of it.
BALLISTIC: Here (Spain) Parrish isn't too known (I didn't know him), but I must say he's amazing _________________ _ _ _____ _ _
http://tayete.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
Jin member
Member # Joined: 09 Jun 2001 Posts: 479 Location: CA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2002 3:53 pm |
|
 |
Tom Carter wrote: |
I wouldn't say that Kinkade lacks talent. I think he does have artistic ability; however, I personally don't like his style (I find it a bit over sensational and canned), but I don't think he is trying to appeal to the me or any other member of the artistic community - he's marketing himself to a broad consumer audience - Grannies and Moms and folks like that, and he's done a pretty good job at it. In that respect I do give him some credit; he's doing what he wants to do and making a living at it; people are buying his stuff.
Being able to successfully market yourself as an artist is in itself an accomplishment, and it's what we all strive for - as creatives - in some way or another. |
I can't resist!
I'm both a "Grannie" and a "Mom" and Thomas Kinkade's paintings make me feel like I've been force fed 6 servings of cotton candy at the county fair all in the span of ten minutes. (Make me shudder with too much sweetness!).
He may have marketing skills, he may have some painting skills, but his work has no depth, no soul. He's got a formula and he's using it, that's about it.
If all a person wants is money, I guess there's nothing to be done about it but it would be a crying shame if any of you really talented people took that path and wasted what you have inside you... the ability to evoke feelings, tell a story... make an impact on the viewer... give them something to remember... something worth remembering.
(Cheezy is a very good word, methinks!)
Don't anyone bother jumping on me for my own lack of painting skills.
I can see. |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2002 6:57 pm |
|
 |
Jinny - no offense to you, for my comments were directed to a more general audience - an audience that would most likely show a disdain to anything other than 6 force fed helpings of cotton candy.
Quote: |
but it would be a crying shame if any of you really talented people took that path and wasted what you have inside you |
I am reading through your comment that you feel Kinkade is wasting his ability. If I am reading that correctly then how do you know? For all any of us know he might be the happiest guy on earth doing what he does, and he might not really care what me, you or anyone anywhere thinks about it. He has a "formula"; people drink it in and throw their money at it. I believe that the biggest problem here is not with Kinkade but rather that the general audience just doesn't have an understanding of fine art and cannot therefore make a fair assessment of what they're purchasing.
Eh - round and round we go. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
spooge demon member
Member # Joined: 15 Nov 1999 Posts: 1475 Location: Haiku, HI, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2002 10:49 pm |
|
 |
I never met the guy, a friend of mine roomed with him at ACCD. im 38
I'm kinda disappointed that people think themselves, outside of anyone's opinion, objectively, aesthetically speaking, above Kincade.
If that is not what you are a saying, forgive me.
Art is subjective, and I am amazed how that fact rolls right off people. "I know art is subjective, but Kincade really sucks!"
I have no illusion that my opinion matters to anyone (personally, I make sure I am practiced on the self-Heimlich before I walk by the Kincade gallery in that mall) so I don't even bother to state it generally.
Us digital artists getting all uppity. Who would have thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
tayete member
Member # Joined: 03 Dec 2000 Posts: 656 Location: Madrid, Spain
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2002 1:03 am |
|
 |
Well Spooge, we could get here in a dangerous-philosophical discussion ("Can a picture be considered art if you don't show it to anyone, if nobody receives a message from it?", etc... I've been reading a lot about that lately, and got no conclussion yet).
I mean, for what I know at the Art Colleges you are taught some basic things that help to spare well rendered pictures from bad ones. I am not an artist, but every time I go to the Prado Museum here at Madrid, I see things in Velazquez that are just the basis of the art classes: light, contrast, colour theory, etc... I am not talking about being a genius, just applying the basic terms of art. If then I go to a gallery, most of the times I'll find paintures made by people who are not as talented as Velazquez, but that still have skills and apply the basic terms of art (even if it is an abstract pictue).
But sincerely, even though this guy seems to "transmit" to some people some kind of message, I cannot find a single brush stroke that could tell me that is part of the lowest scale of art. Yes, it is art, of course, but bad art.
Art may be subjective, but there are certain rules that have survived from the Altamira caves until now...and well, Spooge, I find them in every of your great pictures!  _________________ _ _ _____ _ _
http://tayete.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
Gort member
Member # Joined: 09 Oct 2001 Posts: 1545 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 17, 2002 6:31 am |
|
 |
Quote: |
Art is subjective, and I am amazed how that fact rolls right off people |
Man - how true! I didn't find that out untill I actually went to college, and I found it out the hard way. Being new to the academic scene I was under this naive impression that "anything goes". Finally I am away from the small town and in one of the bastions of creative and objective thinking.
Wrong.
High marks in illustration classes were more likely if you produced work like the instructor(s). I saw people put stuff on the wall that was beautiful work only to have it shot down by an "oh, that's nice". I had a drawing and painting instructor in college that was a Willem DeKooning fan, and if you didn't produce work just like DeKooning you were subjected to a real bonafide snubbing. The sad thing about his class was that it was a low level class meant to teach fundamentals and was required coursework by anyone working on an BFA. Imagine trying to force feed the ramifications of Modernism down the throat of an unsuspecting Photography major. It was one of the most subjective environments I have ever encountered, and I came to loath going to that class as a result.
On a more positive note my life drawing classes were headed up and taught by an extremely objective person. There were people in there that had no drawing or drafting skills at all (photography, art history majors), and he was a master at carrying them gently through the process without bruising anyone's feelings. He made judgements on the efforts of those individuals; they obvioulsy could not draw, but he saw something else in their efforts - they tried really hard, and he made them try hard and was objective in his motives. To this day I hold him in the highest regards. _________________ - Tom Carter
"You can't stop the waves but you can learn to surf" - Jack Kornfield |
|
Back to top |
|
balistic member
Member # Joined: 01 Jun 2000 Posts: 2599 Location: Reno, NV, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 9:01 am |
|
 |
spooge demon wrote: |
I never met the guy, a friend of mine roomed with him at ACCD. im 38
I'm kinda disappointed that people think themselves, outside of anyone's opinion, objectively, aesthetically speaking, above Kincade.
|
Personally, I think there is a certain focus that comes from knowing what I don't want to do . . . some would be quick to call that closed-mindedness, and maybe they're right, but I've always had a harshly-analytical, competitive personality when it comes to art.
Could be that that's immature.
If it is, maybe I'll grow out of it eventually.
Unil then, fuck purple gazebos.
Quote: |
Us digital artists getting all uppity. Who would have thought. |
C'mon man, don't you want to be our leader? All for Craig as president of the digital Salon say "aye" . . . _________________ brian.prince|light.comp.paint |
|
Back to top |
|
eyewoo member
Member # Joined: 23 Jun 2001 Posts: 2662 Location: Carbondale, CO
|
|
Back to top |
|
Lunatique member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 3303 Location: Lincoln, California
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 9:41 pm |
|
 |
Aye! |
|
Back to top |
|
Jin member
Member # Joined: 09 Jun 2001 Posts: 479 Location: CA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 18, 2002 9:48 pm |
|
 |
Tom Carter wrote: |
Jinny - no offense to you, for my comments were directed to a more general audience - an audience that would most likely show a disdain to anything other than 6 force fed helpings of cotton candy.
Quote: |
but it would be a crying shame if any of you really talented people took that path and wasted what you have inside you |
I am reading through your comment that you feel Kinkade is wasting his ability. If I am reading that correctly then how do you know? For all any of us know he might be the happiest guy on earth doing what he does, and he might not really care what me, you or anyone anywhere thinks about it. He has a "formula"; people drink it in and throw their money at it. I believe that the biggest problem here is not with Kinkade but rather that the general audience just doesn't have an understanding of fine art and cannot therefore make a fair assessment of what they're purchasing.
Eh - round and round we go. |
Tom,
I wasn't offended, just amused at the reference to Grannies and Moms and couldn't resist teasing you a little. Though these discussions can be interesting at times, for a while at least, I don't get all heated up about them.
I agree that appreciation of art is subjective, and also think it remains subjective in the final analysis, no matter how educated a person is. There will always be things that appeal to a person on a deeper level than what they've been taught in school, at home, or at work.. or for one reason or another don't appeal to them at all.
It's so easy, and most of us do it, to glump a whole group of people together and make broad genralizations like this, as if we really did all think alike. No matter what age, gender, shape, or other description is applied we don't all think alike. Just look at the differing views in this thread, for instance, when all of us have at least a few things in common... drawing, painting, traditonal media or digital.. or both. The majority of members here seem to be somewhere between 12 and mid to late 30s (just my guess from observation, nothing more), and male. Still, within that group, they don't all think alike.
Please don't worry, I really wasn't offended at all. I think everyone here is simply expressing their thoughts and doing it with respect for others' opinions.
You are misreading me, though, in one area. As you can see from the quote below, I was thinking of people here, not of how Kinkade uses his abilities:
Quote: |
but it would be a crying shame if any of you really talented people took that path and wasted what you have inside you |
I have no idea what Kinkade's abilities are. Maybe what we see is all there is. I'm not concerned about his choices, other than the example they set, but I do hope that young people, if they're going to emulate artists who've gone before them, will find ones who produce something of real and lasting quality, whether or not I like it personally.
There are currently living and working artists who are mentioned here and elsewhere frequently who seem to have earned a good deal of admiration for their talent and skills. I'm sure you can all name them, though I can't. Others are no longer living and continue to draw this kind of admiration year after year, decade after decade. Somehow, I doubt that Kinkade will fall into this category, be remembered and admired in this way after his years of cranking out paintings and selling them are past.
Who knows, though, maybe he will be. Maybe future generations will think of him fondly, remembering their Grannie's Kinkade hanging over her fireplace.  |
|
Back to top |
|
Socar MYLES member
Member # Joined: 27 Jan 2001 Posts: 1229 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 1:54 am |
|
 |
I think the shame about Mr. Kinkade's work is that it never seems to change. He seems to stay always in the same comfort zone, and never expand into new things.
I guess it's just that he's found his niche and is sticking to it, but it seems a bit limiting to me. Or it could be that it's just not to my taste. But I like artists more who are always trying to improve, putting new ideas (even if only new for them) into their work. _________________ Dignity isn't important. It's everything.
www.gorblimey.com - art |
|
Back to top |
|
spooge demon member
Member # Joined: 15 Nov 1999 Posts: 1475 Location: Haiku, HI, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 2:18 am |
|
 |
Sounds like a good way of figuring out what is good and what is not. What keeps peoples interest in the future, and what work influences subsequent artists. The impressionists are remembered because of their influence into artists of the 20th century. Not cause they pretty. I think.
But Jin, I bet a lot of people might have said the same to a lot of popular artists, Rockwell included, and a lot of comic artists, the list goes on. I am sure many have an aesthetic experience in looking at Kincade's work that is equal to any of ours in looking at our favorites . I admire any artist who can do that, regardless of what I may think of the work myself.
But I will go out on a limb here and guess Mr. Kincade will be forgotten rather quickly. Wait and see I suppose. |
|
Back to top |
|
Light member
Member # Joined: 01 Dec 2000 Posts: 528 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 2:40 am |
|
 |
.. |
|
Back to top |
|
Max member
Member # Joined: 12 Aug 2002 Posts: 3210 Location: MIND
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 6:29 am |
|
 |
"aye" |
|
Back to top |
|
eyewoo member
Member # Joined: 23 Jun 2001 Posts: 2662 Location: Carbondale, CO
|
Posted: Tue Nov 19, 2002 6:30 am |
|
 |
My bet is that limb is on a giant oak and is very thick and strong!
Does anyone remember Keene (sp.) - those big soporific eyes. Simple formula painting. Same thing, eh! _________________ HonePie.com
tumblr blog
digtal art |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2005 phpBB Group
|